| Decatur, Ala. | Monday, May 20, 2013 |
|
" ‘The private sector is doing fine' — Obama."
The most significant characteristic of the six-word quote is not that it was spoken by President Barack Obama last week and not that it was directed at Congress. It is that the quote fit into a Twitter post.
The ever-shrinking attention span of Congress seems limited to 140-character insights. Its members are so busy retweeting Obama into oblivion that they are failing to see the human tragedy resulting from political games.
Democrats are playing the same game with GOP contender Mitt Romney, celebrating out-of-context quotes and hoping voters won't read more.
The private sector is not doing fine; only parts of it are. Large corporations have more cash than at any time in history, but they aren't using it to hire people. Investment opportunities for their money are lacking because, in a classic economic spiral, unemployment and uncertainty are high.
Consumer demand — one part of the private sector — is not doing well at all.
Which is what Obama was talking about. Any House members who listened beyond the six-word sound bite would have heard that Obama was proposing a way to restore consumer demand through public investment.
That's what former Republican Presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush did when confronted with recessions far milder than the one inherited by Obama, and in each case the short-term increase in spending did the trick.
It's a solution recommended by economists. It's a solution that Obama repeatedly has tried to implement as the scale of the recession became apparent.
Since January 2010 — when Democrats in the Senate lost their filibuster-proof majority — Congress has blocked his efforts.
In the discussion that was turned into a tweet, Obama was begging Congress to follow the same economic advice that his Republican predecessors followed with Congressional support.
He was asking it to inject money into the economy — ideally by helping state and local governments rehire laid-off employees — to restore the consumer demand that drives the economy.
Obama gave a succinct proposal on how to restore the U.S. economy, and how to protect it from a European crisis exacerbated by the same austerity strategies championed by the U.S. House.
Members of Congress needed to listen, but after 140 characters they lost interest.
|
Not registered? Click here
|
E-mail this
|
Print this
|
| Decatur Daily | @DecaturDaily |
| High School Sports | @DecaturPreps |
| Living | @DecaturLiving |
| Seth Burkett | @DD_SethBurkett |
| Bill Campbell | @DD_BillCampbell |
| Deangelo McDaniel | @DD_Deangelo |
| Eric Fleischauer | @DD_Fleischauer |
| Bayne Hughes | @DD_BayneHughes |
| Ben Montgomery | @DD_BMontgomery |
| Meredith Qualls | @DailyMeredith |
| Mary Sell | @DD_MarySell |
| Ronnie Thomas | @DD_RonnieThomas |
The Keynesian approach of increasing government spending to stimulate economies isn't the right approach. Any economist worth his sheepskin has rejected it. Trotting out the list of presidents who've followed this method, whether Democrat or Republican, doesn't make it sound policy. The only people who tout it are the same ones that believe all solutions come from the government. The real solution is to unleash the private sector and individual consumers by lowering taxes and reducing government shackles on small businesses.
Right, the trillions already borrowed were just not enough. And we all know that in our own households, our finances improve when we borrow and spend, right? The sad thing is most people agree, and truly believe that we as a nation would not be in trouble and our problems would disappear if we simply borrowed more money and spent it.
Some old story. Things are bad, but it's not my (Obama's) fault. Blame Bush.