The Republican National Convention borrowed from the playbooks of Karl Marx and Ayn Rand in manufacturing a conflict last week.
|
|
|
Eric Fleischauer |
"We built that," was the theme of the convention. It was a reaction to President Barack Obama's comment, "If you've got a business, you didn't build that."
Almost every GOP speaker repeated the, "We built that," theme. It was a glorification of the business owner that presented a stark contrast to Obama's claim that capitalists deserve no credit.
Over and over at the convention, a spliced version of Obama's comments played in the background. Speakers rejected the claim just as often, with words like those of U.S. Sen. Rand Paul: "When the president says, ‘You didn't build that,' he is flat out wrong. Businessmen and women did build that."
Marx saw this conflict as inevitable. Marx viewed the class the GOP was promoting, the bourgeoisie, as the oppressor of the far more numerous proletariat.
Rand preached the flip side of the Marxist coin. She too saw the classes as being in conflict.
As made clear in this statement by a hero of her novel, "Atlas Shrugged," she had a very different view of the identity of the oppressor:
"Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or the looters who take your product by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce."
GOP vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan is a devotee of Rand.
"I grew up reading Ayn Rand and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are, and what my beliefs are," he said at a speech to the Rand revivalist Atlas Society in 2005. "It's inspired me so much that it's required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff."
So on one side of the conflict highlighted at the GOP convention we have the owners of the means of production, and on the other we have the moochers and looters, or proletariat. Using Occupy Wall Street terminology, it is basically the conflict between the 1 percent and the 99 percent.
If Obama so firmly embraced the side of the proletariat, as the edited quote replayed at the convention and in Mitt Romney ads suggests, it may be no surprise that the Romney campaign sided with the oppressed bourgeoisie.
The quote Romney uses in his assertion that Obama is slamming business owners, however, is a fabrication. The full quote is below, with the portions that were deleted from the GOP video and audio loops in italics:
"Let me tell you something. There are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business, you didn't build that."
As a reporter, I have interviewed dozens of successful businessmen. Not one would disagree with Obama's unedited statement. They credited their success to factors outside their direct control: hard-working employees, customers and, frequently, the government-created infrastructure or incentives that allowed them to operate.
They were, I know, being humble. I owned a business, and it was hard work. It involved risk, stress and an overwhelming sense of responsibility to the employees whose livelihood depended on my continued investment.
I miss the financial rewards that came with my bourgeois status, but little else. In a democracy, capitalist humility makes a lot of sense. As Rand suggested in "Atlas Shrugged," the proletariat has the power to shape the government in a democracy. It can — through its votes — raise capital-gains and inheritance taxes to confiscatory levels. It can refrain from maintaining institutions that protect property rights and educate the work force. It can eliminate the corporate shell, making owners responsible for corporate liabilities.
For sound economic reasons, our society reserves its greatest financial rewards for capitalists. A class-conscious democracy could destroy that reward system and undermine our economy.
The Romney campaign has not just reacted to class conflict, it has created it. With the deceptive editing of Obama's statement, and the decision to use the spliced version as a theme for the Republican National Convention, it has fueled the very conflict that Marx and Rand anticipated.
While Marx recognized the class tensions the GOP exploited in Tampa, history has shown him utterly wrong in his conclusions. Marx was right that the capitalist cannot succeed without the more numerous proletariat, but he was wrong in his belief that the proletariat can succeed without the skill and capital of the bourgeoisie.
On the eve of Labor Day in 1936 — a time when Joseph Stalin controlled the Soviet Union and the financial distress of Americans was even greater than it is today — President Franklin Delano Roosevelt feared the consequences of a belligerent capitalist class.
In what could have been a rebuke of the Tampa conventioneers, Roosevelt said, "It is those short-sighted ones, not labor, who threaten this country with that class dissension which in other countries has led to dictatorship and the establishment of fear and hatred as the dominant emotions in human life."
In America, he said, "We refuse to regard those who work with hand or brain as different from or inferior to those who live from their property. We insist that labor is entitled to as much respect as property ... Our needs are one in building an orderly economic democracy in which all can profit."
Contact Eric Fleischauer at www.mile304.com or eric@decaturdaily.com.
|
Not registered? Click here
|
E-mail this
|
Print this
|
| Decatur Daily | @DecaturDaily |
| High School Sports | @DecaturPreps |
| Living | @DecaturLiving |
| Seth Burkett | @DD_SethBurkett |
| Bill Campbell | @DD_BillCampbell |
| Deangelo McDaniel | @DD_Deangelo |
| Eric Fleischauer | @DD_Fleischauer |
| Bayne Hughes | @DD_BayneHughes |
| Ben Montgomery | @DD_BMontgomery |
| Meredith Qualls | @DailyMeredith |
| Mary Sell | @DD_MarySell |
| Ronnie Thomas | @DD_RonnieThomas |
'Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business, you didn't build that." The truth is, businesses DID build that through paying their taxes and building a strong economy. President Obama paints the picture that businesses had no part in it, which is highly disengenous. Of course no business owner thinks they could do it without the existing infrastructure. But the infrastructure couldn't be built WITHOUT tax money generated by the business owners and the salaries paid to their employees. If it were as simple as building roads and businesses would miracuously pop up, then the President's statement would be true. But, of course, he's wrong.
The only party dividing classes is the Democrat Party. The conservative movement wants to build opportunity for all people. There's no class division involved in it at all.
1. If President Obama was right in saying, "you didn't build that", why does the media, including Eric Fleischauer, feel a need
to explain the President's true meaning, when the President is, according to Vice-President Biden, "articulate and clean"?
2. Now that the media and Mr. Fleischauer have provided the correct interpretation of President Obama's unscripted utterance,
why does not the President continue to espouse this opinion?
3. Why, after this remark, does President Obama adhere strictly to a teleprompter and no longer deviates from prepared
statements?
4. If blending capitalism and socialism is beneficial, why is Europe on the verge of economic ruin?
John Locke, de Montesquieu, Thomas Paine, and others who conceived, and, whose thoughts shaped our civilization, did not do so in rural, back page newspaper columns. Why on earth should serious economic consideration be given to the opinion of a middle-aged man who reached the pinnacle of his success at a small, failing newspaper? Are we to believe that George Washington and Alexander Hamilton erred and little Eric Fleischauer is correct? The readership may rest in the secure knowledge that Mr. Fleischauer' intellect does not rival that of the Founding Fathers. Alongside Thomas Jefferson's
writing, Mr. Fleischauer's efforts seem rather puny indeed.
5. Eric, regarding your somewhat different philosophy on government and economics, did you build that?
Bravo, Mr. Fleischauser! Here's to hoping your simple, but factual, analysis will pierce the closed minds who imagine that they too are part of the proletariat - the working class voter who supports republican efforts to make the rich richer, more powerful - because someday they too might be the one percent....
And now that the Democratic convention is underway, it is clear what they believe now that they took any reference to God out and put in homosexuality and baby killing.....making Obama and his party the Godless, homosexual baby killing party....God help us.....
When that rubber band breaks from being stretched to much it's going to sting.